The Unofficial Mamod and Other Steam Forum The Unofficial Mamod and Other Steam Forum
The Original Unofficial Toy Steam Forum
Established 2006
The biggest, most popular steam forum around! Accept NO imitations!
We have a growing community of regular posting members who chat about all aspects of toy and model steam.
 
FAQ :: Search :: Memberlist :: Usergroups :: Join! (free)
Profile :: Log in to check your private messages :: Log in

Chat Safe Rules

Having Trouble Joining ? Click here.


Update to the loco rebuilding saga, better, but not 100%

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Unofficial Mamod and Other Steam Forum Forum Index -> Locomotives
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Spule 4


Junior Member


Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 109
Location: Nashville, USA

PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:22 pm    Post subject: Update to the loco rebuilding saga, better, but not 100% Reply with quote

All:

So now the loco has:

IP bits are: Cylinders, Boiler(/w regulator, improved saftey valve and injector), Spacer and Bufferplates

Sidestreet Banerworks: Burner

PPS: Wheels, Cylinder Gaskets and.....something else?

Roundhouse: lubricator

Mamod (mechanical) bits are: reverser and con rods.  Frames and body are also Mamod.  I think now it is actually a Jan-mod!

With the Roundhouse lubricator, the footplate is much cleaner, I will take a photo here in a day or so.

It runs great on the bench on both compressed air and steam.  Uses a good amount of steam oil, and a decent amount of condensation and a slight bit of remaining oil came out of the lubricator.

.....but still (as before last spring) it can hardly move itself on the rails, nevermind pull or push anything.  As it ran VERY well back in the camel dung and Mamod safety valve days, and the same in the Sidestreet upgrades I gave it in the 1980s, this is perplexing.

Inspection after things cooled down shows there are a few things left to do:

1.  There is a kink in the exhaust line where it bends up to leave the reverser and up into the smokebox, need to get that.  I noticed wiggling the exhaust line impacted the running of the loco, so I bet this is the main problem?

2. I do need to pack the cylinder nuts.

3.  I did check the chassis for binds (there are not any) but apparently the front bearings and mounting nuts spin freely on the frame.  I could never get them where they would tighten against the frame.  I guess I need to cram a couple spacers in there.

4. Re-pack the wicks (the one at the front of the loco will go out from time to time).  More reading to do here: http://www.roundhouse-eng.com/spirit.htm

Any other ideas of things to check...other than sanity?
_________________
Garrett
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Les


Steam Supreme Being


Joined: 03 Nov 2007
Posts: 8433
Location: Bournemouth, Dorset.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So it's a Frankenloco then.  
_________________
Les - Old age isn't so bad when you consider the alternatives.

www.freewebs.com/lesmarsh
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Graham-Jilly


Steam Legend!!


Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 4324
Location: Brisbane Qld Australia

PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 11:03 pm    Post subject: Re: Update to the loco rebuilding saga, better, but not 100% Reply with quote

Spule 4 wrote:
All:

So now the loco has:

IP bits are: Cylinders, Boiler(/w regulator, improved saftey valve and injector), Spacer and Bufferplates

Sidestreet Banerworks: Burner

PPS: Wheels, Cylinder Gaskets and.....something else?

Roundhouse: lubricator

Mamod (mechanical) bits are: reverser and con rods.  Frames and body are also Mamod.  I think now it is actually a Jan-mod!

With the Roundhouse lubricator, the footplate is much cleaner, I will take a photo here in a day or so.

It runs great on the bench on both compressed air and steam.  Uses a good amount of steam oil, and a decent amount of condensation and a slight bit of remaining oil came out of the lubricator.

.....but still (as before last spring) it can hardly move itself on the rails, nevermind pull or push anything.  As it ran VERY well back in the camel dung and Mamod safety valve days, and the same in the Sidestreet upgrades I gave it in the 1980s, this is perplexing.

Inspection after things cooled down shows there are a few things left to do:

1.  There is a kink in the exhaust line where it bends up to leave the reverser and up into the smokebox, need to get that.  I noticed wiggling the exhaust line impacted the running of the loco, so I bet this is the main problem?

2. I do need to pack the cylinder nuts.

3.  I did check the chassis for binds (there are not any) but apparently the front bearings and mounting nuts spin freely on the frame.  I could never get them where they would tighten against the frame.  I guess I need to cram a couple spacers in there.

4. Re-pack the wicks (the one at the front of the loco will go out from time to time).  More reading to do here: http://www.roundhouse-eng.com/spirit.htm

Any other ideas of things to check...other than sanity?

what is a Sidestreet Banerworks burner ??????????
_________________
http://www.freewebs.com/aclr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Spule 4


Junior Member


Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 109
Location: Nashville, USA

PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 1:22 am    Post subject: Re: Update to the loco rebuilding saga, better, but not 100% Reply with quote

Graham-Jilly wrote:

what is a Sidestreet Banerworks burner ??????????




I also bought the Van Dort lubricator, Goodall Valve and Shirley Safety Valve, all from the now defunct West Lawn Locomotive Works.  All were bought on June of 1987 or 1988.

http://www.sidestreetbannerworks.com/locos/loco36.html

A Mamod loco just sold on eBay.com today with a Shirley valve and West Lawn burner, so they do come around from time to time.
_________________
Garrett
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DLR


Full member


Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 552
Location: Blyth

PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

its the "O"ring cylinders. it might pull something on the track when its cold and on air but when it heats up the glands are machined to such fine tolerances they clamp on to the piston rod. This is what happened with mine and a few other 16millers on their locos.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Graham-Jilly


Steam Legend!!


Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 4324
Location: Brisbane Qld Australia

PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

well I found with the O ringed pistons they need a small amout of backpressure and they run great am very happy with them
just view some of my vids
_________________
http://www.freewebs.com/aclr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Spule 4


Junior Member


Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 109
Location: Nashville, USA

PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DLR wrote:
its the "O"ring cylinders. it might pull something on the track when its cold and on air but when it heats up the glands are machined to such fine tolerances they clamp on to the piston rod. This is what happened with mine and a few other 16millers on their locos.


Hmm, I was thinking the opposite, as there was a bit of a steam leak from both of them?

How did you fix this problem with your model?

Thanks for the reply.
_________________
Garrett
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Spule 4


Junior Member


Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 109
Location: Nashville, USA

PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Graham-Jilly wrote:
well I found with the O ringed pistons they need a small amout of backpressure and they run great am very happy with them
just view some of my vids


OK, I remember your post about this, and did some reading of the "Mamod Handbook" and have a couple things to check now.

Thanks for the reply.
_________________
Garrett
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DLR


Full member


Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 552
Location: Blyth

PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I didn't fix it. I sent them back and bought the standard MSS cylinders which can be run on lower pressure ( with the O ring ones fitted, the boiler was at 50psi)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Titan


Full member


Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 721
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm, O ringed cylinders should work at the same pressure as normal ones.  Whilst there is more friction from the O rings, this is more than compensated for by the efficiency gains through reduction in leakage.

Indeed that is the key to good running - minimising the leaks and unfortunately it is the most difficult thing to achieve. Often leaks are difficult to spot! I still have not got Titan up to the standard it was at before it was worn out ten years ago, but it is slowly getting there!

The second thing is having a good fire, if you are making lots of steam in the first place you can get away with quite a number of leaks before performance turns bad.  make sure that the wicks are trimmed right and all are producing a good flame and it will help a lot.
_________________
It's a Mamod Jim, but not as we know it!

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Graham-Jilly


Steam Legend!!


Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 4324
Location: Brisbane Qld Australia

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I totaly agree with Titan.
Ive just built and tested my own wick burner for my loco and its delivering great heat and the loco ran very well last night and virtualy flew up the gradient that is on my line. and also i found that the o ringed pistons need a lot of running in for best performance as well
_________________
http://www.freewebs.com/aclr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Spule 4


Junior Member


Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 109
Location: Nashville, USA

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 10:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the replies!

From my reading here (and a lot of other areas) I think I have a few things nailed down.

I am guessing that the O ring pistons are going to need more running in.

At least I am getting steam oil, a LOT of steam oil now through the beast.  The previous deadleg lubricator was not as good for this.
_________________
Garrett
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Unofficial Mamod and Other Steam Forum Forum Index -> Locomotives All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
smartBlue Style © 2002 Smartor
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
 

Welcome to The Unofficial Mamod & Other Steam Forum!
Welcome. We're a friendly place to share knowledge & chat about this great hobby. Since our Jul ’06 startup, we’ve grown to over 350 members, who have posted over a quarter of a million posts. We can answer most toy steam questions, basic or complex. Our multi-national members enjoy sharing photos & videos of engines by Mamod, Wilesco, Jensen, Bowman, SEL, Doll, Bing, Scorpion, Renown & more. All collectors are welcome & if you are just starting out in the hobby, we can suggest some ideal engines. Our forum is ad free & costs nothing to be a member.
Press the 'Join' button at the top of the page, to be part of the largest toy steam forum on the internet.
Questions? Email the forum’s Administrator: Chantry_James at yahoo.co.uk
Engine of the Month October
Clinton's Workshop 2008
Boiler by Model Components Australia.
Engine by Bassett Lowke

Click picture to enlarge