Wallace
|
Youtube or PhotobucketWas going to do some vids today, but the weather wasn't the best.
Anyway, just wondering which do you all think is the best for uploading and showing vids.
Youtube or photobucket. So far I have only used Photobucket, but like the idea of comments and stuff on Youtube.
Any opinions? Is one faster to upload too, or have better qual?
Cheers
|
James
|
I use both, but youtube more 
|
Mamodman123
|
Doesn't really matter too much, youtube is fine 
|
Graham-Jilly
|
we have been using both. youtube comes up quicker
|
Lewis
|
i prefer photobucket personally
|
IndianaRog
|
Wallace, I have been using YouTube to support 40+ videos on my website and for consistency will continue to do so...but as I have gotten comfortable with PhotoBucket I have found several things in favor of it:
1) faster loadup I believe
2) better quality of the finished video
3) easy integration into the forum
4) nicer album/sub album sorting features
YouTube does allow for comments which PhotoBucket does not, but so far that is the only advantage I have seen.
YouTube has one annoying feature I don't like. Once a video is loaded up, it takes overnite before it is available to my website provider's YouTube link feature. In other words...the video is THERE (at YouTube), but takes 12-24 hours for it to be accessible to Freewebs.com my website provider. Don't know why this is, but a nuisance factor.
I give the nod to PhotoBucket.
Rog
|
seven.mpd
|
Photobucket less cr*p on the page
|
Wallace
|
Thanks for all the advice.
Looks like I'll stick with Photobucket 
|
steamyman
|
i like both
|
MTA
|
I would only use Photobucket if YouTube didn't support a certain file type that Photobucket allows.
|
