 |
The Unofficial Mamod and Other Steam Forum The Original Unofficial Toy Steam Forum Established 2006 The biggest, most popular steam forum around! Accept NO imitations! We have a growing community of regular posting members who chat about all aspects of toy and model steam.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Titan
 Full member

Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 697 Location: Derby
|
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The thing is you do not really want a burner that can outlast the boiler capacity, unless you fit a water top up valve.
I was wondering if it would be possible to fit this arrangement in to the scuttle of a roller/traction engine/steam wagon, and put a water top up valve on the boiler - i am sure you could get some fantatically long runs then! _________________ It's a Mamod Jim, but not as we know it!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mamodman123
 Steam God!

Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 31247 Location: Midlands, UK
|
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Titan wrote: | The thing is you do not really want a burner that can outlast the boiler capacity, unless you fit a water top up valve.
I was wondering if it would be possible to fit this arrangement in to the scuttle of a roller/traction engine/steam wagon, and put a water top up valve on the boiler - i am sure you could get some fantatically long runs then! |
I already have a top up valve in Rosa so I shouldn't think it would be a problem.
The same sort of thing should work for the TE1a/SR1a as you said Titan, would get very long runs if you kept filling both up  _________________ Solid Fuel tablets explode
You could get a nice flatbase for that
www.mamodsteam.tk
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Titan
 Full member

Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 697 Location: Derby
|
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mamodman123 wrote: |
Modifying the original burner looks do-able as there is space either side of the original burner to hold 2 smaller tanks either side!
Hmmm food for thought  |
If you were putting extra tanks either side it would not be a chicken feed system, just a conventional one with extra tanks. Having said that it does sound like a viable alternative - should at least be able to double capacity, if not more! _________________ It's a Mamod Jim, but not as we know it!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mamodman123
 Steam God!

Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 31247 Location: Midlands, UK
|
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Titan wrote: | | Mamodman123 wrote: |
Modifying the original burner looks do-able as there is space either side of the original burner to hold 2 smaller tanks either side!
Hmmm food for thought  |
If you were putting extra tanks either side it would not be a chicken feed system, just a conventional one with extra tanks. Having said that it does sound like a viable alternative - should at least be able to double capacity, if not more! |
It is a lot simpiler too! may do that, although I like the idea of a tender for it. Which i could still have I suppose  _________________ Solid Fuel tablets explode
You could get a nice flatbase for that
www.mamodsteam.tk
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|